Don’t get it wrong
The relationship between a corporate and its stakeholders is always delicate. The last couple of months have seen a couple of issues of particular interest to the treasurer community which reflect investor anxiety.
The Treasurer last month reported on Moody’s proposals for rating transitions for investment-grade issues subject to event risk. This month Moody’s has been at it again, this time suggesting a new framework for evaluating bond covenants. The rationale for the move by the rating agency is that in recent years as corporate strategies have become more aggressive, inadequate document protections have weakened the positions of bondholders vis-à-vis shareholders.
As private equity continues to exert its influence on the markets, corporates are appreciating investors’ concerns on changes of control and are increasingly comfortable with giving protection, although the extent is dictated by individual circumstances.
On the idea of Moody’s framework there seems to be some hesitation among treasurers, mostly on the grounds that sophisticated financial markets can work out for themselves what protection or otherwise individual change of control clauses offer.
Whatever the outcome of Moody’s covenant framework, it is another indication of the changing environment in which the treasurer is operating and will be operating. This is most starkly illustrated by the latest changes in British company law arising from the European Union’s transparency directive. As we have suggested before, the standard setters seem to be suggesting that the purpose of accounts is subtly shifting away from stewardship and towards being a tool to inform investment decisions.
The purpose of the transparency directive is to improve investor protection and the efficiency of the European capital markets. As part of the desire for greater investor protection, the companies bill currently completing its passage through parliament will make companies trading on a UK-regulated market liable to compensate investors for losses as a result of statements or omissions in annual or half-yearly reporting statements that were knowingly untrue or misleading and were made in bad faith or recklessly.
Under current UK law, shareholders have little redress against a company for losses arising from being misled by financial information unless a specific duty is owed, as, for instance, in a prospectus. The legislation therefore represents a major reordering of the balance of rights and responsibilities between corporates and investors. From disclosure and transparency through to liability, you can see the logical transition. The pressures are multiplying on treasurers – and their colleagues – not to get it wrong.
PETER WILLIAMS
Editor
See Marketwatch, pages 6 and 8
ACT relaunches improved MCT
The ACT has updated the syllabus and created a new delivery mechanism for its MCT qualification. The move follows the development of the AMCT syllabus in 2005 and reflects the developing need for a flexible, practical qualification for senior finance professionals.
Pension liabilities have started to leave their mark on private equity deals, with underfunded schemes causing a stir, according to an analyst survey.
Guide to LMA mandate letters for syndicated loans
The ACT has updated its borrowers’ guide to the Loan Market Association’s (LMA) documentation by adding a new section covering the mandate letter. The mandate letter is a critical document for the borrower at the start of the process of arranging a loan facility, since, together with the term sheet annexed to it, it determines the key terms on which the syndicate will be assembled and funding provided.
Acquisitive Premier Foods has set out its stall for further shopping sprees by funding its takeover of Campbell’s UK with a bold one-for-one rights issue, raising £458.5 and putting in place new borrowing facilities topping £1bn.
Why should corporates check that their debt/equity level and debt composition are optimal?
The US-inspired slowdown may seem bad news but could turn out to be a positive development by helping the hard-pressed energy and raw materials markets and giving much needed relief to the world’s borrowers. The demand for leveraged credit products remains strong. One risk is the possibility of a US dollar crisis.
Emap has appointed a new Group Treasurer, due to start in December this year. Helping the company find the right person for the post – as well as holding the fort for the last 15 months – has proved an exciting and challenging role for interim Group Treasurer, Julie Baker.
Asset due diligence involves ensuring information about the asset pool is consistent with the underlying assets; rating agency due diligence is about ensuring the deal is sustainable; legal due diligence concentrates on compiling and reviewing relevant legal documentation.
Software company and serial acquirer Sage has made the headlines many times over the years with multiple high-profile deals. Its most recent acquisition – of US healthcare company Emdeon Practice Services – was big news in the summer, but in some ways it was business as usual.
This is the ninth year in which The Treasurer has been running its prestigious Deals of the Year Awards. The awards provide an opportunity for treasurers to reinforce their contribution to the corporate landscape and to inspire others to follow their example. Previous winners include Bayer, BBC, Cadbury Schweppes, EMI, Land Securities, Mitchells & Butlers, and Tesco.
Generating revenue and cashflow is at the core of every business. Ensuring that the corporate has adequate funds to run the business, meet operating expenses, and pay shareholders and debt holders is a key task and one that must be done as efficiently as possible.
Since its launch in 2002, CLS(Continuous Linked Settlement) has expanded considerably, both in the number of currencies covered and the volume of payment instructions settled. The initial seven currencies have risen to 15, and in June 2006 CLS Bank settled a record daily average of 291,087 payment instructions with a gross value exceeding $2.7 trillion.
Whatever the operational problem, it is typically possible to avoid ever having to solve it by taking the more difficult strategic decisions and then implementing them without delay.
Private equity or venture capital-backed investments initially fell outside UK-to-UK domestic transfer pricing legislation introduced in 2004. The government has now reversed this anomaly, and next year sees the end of the grandfathering period. While this does not appear to have slowed the flow of private equity deals, companies – especially those that are highly leveraged – need to consider how the rules will affect their tax deductions.
Treasurers must reassess the whole profile of their risk financing and be bolder in assessing the most suitable means of addressing the potential financial needs consequent on risk events.
After the Pensions Regulator’s first year, its strategy for managing risks to scheme members, and the resulting impact on corporates and other parties to transactions, are both clearer. But what can be done to protect against regulatory action, and what alternatives are available for treasurers when negotiating funding terms with newly empowered trustees?
The European financial market needs volatility to provide margin, yet algorithmic traders, who have increased significantly in numbers over recent years, are undermining this. By taking some of the risk out of the market, are they slowly killing it? Could this have consequences for the stability of economic infrastructure?
Following the developments to the AMCT syllabus in 2005, this month sees the introduction of an updated syllabus and a new delivery mechanism for the MCT. The changes reflect the developing need for a flexible, practical qualification for those working in senior financial roles, and the increased use of new communication technologies within qualifications. Read more about the changes by visiting www.treasurers.org/mct.
Maternity leave is something no one takes much notice of until they are actually facing it. People don't sit and decide whether or not to have a baby while working for their current employers depending on the generosity of the maternity benefits.