In many cases, companies setting out to manage cash more effectively – or embarking on a treasury management system (TMS) implementation – regard the exercise as a self-contained treasury function project with perhaps some information requirements from subsidiaries.
But when one company needed to transform its cash and treasury management activities, the treasurer opted for a more far-reaching approach.
“The business is growing quickly by acquisition and has quite a decentralised culture, with a lot of bank accounts and disparate financial and banking systems,” says David Stebbings, director, treasury advisory at PwC.
“At the same time, the company operates in a constantly changing business environment. As such, they needed to have a better handle on their cash and risks, and improve central oversight over their banking arrangements globally.”
The treasurer, therefore, initiated a project to improve visibility over cash and enable more effective management of financial risks and positions.
The goals of the project also included streamlining processes, moving users away from older systems and spreadsheets, implementing global standards around the newly formed group and achieving efficiencies through automation to better enable time to be spent on more value-add insight activities.
With a clear view of the desired outcome, the company sought advice from PwC about how to achieve its aims. This involved developing a revised treasury and cash operating model, with the implementation of technology being used to facilitate the change.
The chosen technology solution included a new TMS aligned with a SWIFT component, and a bank account management module.
The key challenge for this project has been implementing a more centralised treasury and cash operating model in a company that is well served by its decentralised business model.
Hence, this project involved looking at the TMS not as an isolated system for use by one department, but as a technology with many interfaces, processes, users and requirements all around the business.
“It’s not a treasury project as such – it’s a treasury and cash activity project for the whole businesses wherever those activities occur,” explains Stebbings. “A few of the users do sit in central treasury, but the vast majority of them work in shared service centres and finance teams around the world.”
As a result, such an exercise is actually a more complex business change project. As Birgita Gjirja, senior manager, treasury advisory at PwC, observes, “In designing the operating model and systems landscape, it’s important to take a step back and think about where those interactions are between treasury and other finance and business functions and systems worldwide.”
In order to achieve success, the company’s treasurer needs to look beyond the scope of their own responsibilities, becoming more strategic and working closely with other senior stakeholders across the organisation.
While this added project complexity and challenge, the benefits to the treasurer can be considerable – not just in achieving the desired level of visibility and overall control, but allowing the treasury remit to move more easily to a strategic level.
Widening the scope also helps build a more compelling business case for change.
The treasurer found this to be a highly effective approach for this project, which is currently due to go live in the coming months.
Remember that a TMS can be a very powerful tool and change agent if designed and implemented appropriately. So make sure you invest the required time and resources into the project, particularly if you are including treasury and cash activities outside of treasury.
As told to freelance treasury journalist Rebecca Brace
This article was taken from the October/November 2018 issue of The Treasurer magazine. For more great insights, log in to view the full issue or sign up for eAffiliate membership